BizChinaUpdate Newsletter
 

Email:

Full Name:

Home arrow News & Interviews arrow News January 2008 arrow China Blamed for Rising British Product Recalls: Part II
China Blamed for Rising British Product Recalls: Part II PDF Print E-mail

By Gary Bowerman, on Thursday, 17 January 2008

Published in : The News, News January 2008


Earlier this week we briefly summarised a new report by law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, which said that the 2007 rise in product recalls in the UK reflected the fact that it was “the year the Chinese supply chain proved to have sting in its tail.” Below, is the full text of RPC’s official report release.


The number of product recalls in the UK has hit a new high of 190 in the last year (up from 179 in the previous year) as problems with products sourced from China mounted. The number of recalls of dangerous or faulty consumer goods rose 22 per cent, to 89, whilst the number of food & drink recalls also increased, from 71 to 74.

RPC says that it has been the year in which poorly controlled Chinese supply chains have proved they have a nasty sting in their tail. Mattel's Fisher Price brand clocked up blanket media coverage when it was forced to make a series of recalls covering millions of potentially dangerous Chinese manufactured toys.

Mark Kendall, Partner of RPC, says: "We have been warning for years of the risks in uncontrolled out-sourcing to China and other developing countries. Many companies need the cost savings from outsourcing to China to drive their earnings but the statistics show that putting in place proper quality control procedures to protect their customers is easier said than done. While lessons will have been learned from the Mattel recall, the problem will not be solved over night. We expect to see more of the same."

The good news is that companies are now more willing to move early to launch product recall programmes in order to protect their reputations but the bad news is that these expensive programmes are often undertaken without any product recall insurance coverage to offset the costs.

Explains Mark Kendall: "When you add up the costs of the transportation, publicising the recall, refunds and other factors it can be very costly. Standard product liability insurance will not cover for a recall."

"But, insurance or no insurance, the costs of trying to avoid a necessary recall in terms of reputational damage, regulatory intervention and potential lawsuits can be huge."

"Consumer groups are more litigious than ever and regulators in the UK such as the Food Standards Agency and Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency promise a tough stance against dangerous products."

Merck which has been accused of delaying the recall of its Vioxx painkiller drug has faced legal fees of USD500m a year to defend against lawsuits. This month the company offered to pay USD4.85bn to settle 26,000 lawsuits. Vioxx was found to increase the chances of a heart attack. The total cost of the Vioxx problem is currently estimated at USD8bn.

Despite some exceptions, such as insects found in batches of cereal, there was a smaller rise in UK food recalls and a decrease in pharmaceutical recalls. RPC says this is due to the fact that food and drugs sold in the UK are either produced in the UK or in other Western countries where the existing systems for quality control are more robust than in China.

For more information, visit: www.rpc.co.uk

 


Last update : Thursday, 17 January 2008

   
Quote this article in website
Favoured
Print
Send to friend
Related articles
Save this to del.icio.us

Keywords : Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, RPC, Recall, Supply Chain, UK


Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

 


Add your comment
Name
E-mail
Title  
 
Comment
  Available characters:  
   Notify me of follow-up comments
   
   

No comment posted

 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement
RSS - Subscribe to the BCU Feed

Member's Area Login

Members please login:

Advertisement